The gaming industry is slowly normalizing a new number. Ninety nine. One hundred. Sometimes more.
Collectors editions. Deluxe editions. Early access bundles. Premium upgrades. Add ons at launch. Expansion passes before release day.
Publishers argue that development costs have exploded. Production values rival Hollywood. Teams are larger. Expectations are higher.
All of that may be true. But here is the uncomfortable part. The base price is not the only price anymore.
The Real Cost Is Not the Sticker
When a game launches at seventy, ninety or one hundred dollars, that is rarely the full spend. Add:
Battle passes
Cosmetic bundles
Season content
Premium currencies
Expansion packs
Suddenly the real lifetime value per player increases far beyond the advertised entry point. For publishers, this is rational. For players, it accumulates. And when accumulation feels endless, trust erodes.
The Marketing Strategy Behind the Price Shift
Anchoring with premium tiers
By placing a 120 dollar edition next to a 70 dollar one, the standard feels reasonable.Fragmenting value
Instead of one expensive product, players see multiple optional enhancements. Each small purchase feels harmless.Reframing longevity as justification
Games are marketed as multi year platforms, not single products. Higher cost is framed as long term investment.
None of this is illegal. But it is psychological. And psychology always works both ways.
Where the Risk Lies
When players feel nickel and dimed, marketing loses moral authority. When deluxe editions feel mandatory rather than optional, loyalty declines. When every game tries to extract maximum lifetime value, players start to hesitate before entering any ecosystem.
Price increases are not the danger. Perceived fairness is.
Takeaways
If you increase price, increase clarity. Show exactly what players receive and why it matters.
Avoid designing premium tiers that make standard editions feel incomplete.
Protect perceived fairness more than short term revenue spikes.
Long term trust produces higher lifetime value than aggressive early monetization.
The debate is not really about whether games should cost one hundred dollars. It is about whether players feel respected while paying it. Gaming has always been emotional. And pricing is emotional too. If the industry forgets that, no amount of marketing framing will protect it.
If you are interested in copywriting for more leads, you might like my new book for Amazon Kindle: MARKETING LEADS COPYWRITING.